On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 05:44:10PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 05:39:05PM +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote: > > Thanks to Borislav Petkov for his reply, too - > > however I'd like to state that given this lack of tooling/attention > > writing a mail in this more special manner was fully justified IMPHO. > > Ok, you've stated more than clearly that you're pissed with the current > situation - I think we all got that. Hohumm. > Now, how do you suggest we change it constructively and how are you > willing to help? IMHO that's some common "misconception" - namely that innocent observing by-standers are fully expected to get involved in the process. Not necessarily, however (that's what domain experts are there for - since people are well-advised to concentrate on the activities that they are commonly involved with/do best). I would be willing to handle corrections in the areas of drivers I was working on (some corrections were already queued locally). For scripted mechanisms (e.g. usefully nagging people as stated in another posting), someone else would have to work on it I'm afraid. Thanks, Andreas Mohr -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
