Em Tue, 04 Dec 2012 10:04:36 -0700
Lance Ortiz <lance.ortiz@xxxxxx> escreveu:
> This patch will provide a more reliable and easy way for user-space
> applications to have access to AER logs rather than reading them from the
> message buffer. It also provides a way to notify user-space when an AER
> event occurs.
>
> The aer driver is updated to generate a trace event of function 'aer_event'
> when a PCIe error is reported over the AER interface. The trace event was
> added to both the interrupt based aer path and the firmware first path.
>
> v1-v2 fix compile errors in ifdefs.
> v2-v3 Update to new location of trace header. Update print to remove
> warning.
> v3-v4 Reworked logic when getting ready to call cper_print_aer
> Signed-off-by: Lance Ortiz <lance.ortiz@xxxxxx>
> ---
>
> 0 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/cper.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/cper.c
> index e6defd8..4a3e945 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/cper.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/cper.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
> #include <linux/time.h>
> #include <linux/cper.h>
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include <linux/pci.h>
> #include <linux/aer.h>
>
> /*
> @@ -249,6 +250,10 @@ static const char *cper_pcie_port_type_strs[] = {
> static void cper_print_pcie(const char *pfx, const struct cper_sec_pcie *pcie,
> const struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata)
> {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_PCIEAER
> + struct pci_dev *dev;
> +#endif
> +
> if (pcie->validation_bits & CPER_PCIE_VALID_PORT_TYPE)
> printk("%s""port_type: %d, %s\n", pfx, pcie->port_type,
> pcie->port_type < ARRAY_SIZE(cper_pcie_port_type_strs) ?
> @@ -281,10 +286,18 @@ static void cper_print_pcie(const char *pfx, const struct cper_sec_pcie *pcie,
> "%s""bridge: secondary_status: 0x%04x, control: 0x%04x\n",
> pfx, pcie->bridge.secondary_status, pcie->bridge.control);
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_PCIEAER
> - if (pcie->validation_bits & CPER_PCIE_VALID_AER_INFO) {
> - struct aer_capability_regs *aer_regs = (void *)pcie->aer_info;
> - cper_print_aer(pfx, gdata->error_severity, aer_regs);
> + dev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(pcie->device_id.segment,
> + pcie->device_id.bus, pcie->device_id.function);
> + if (!dev) {
> + pr_info("PCI AER Cannot get PCI device %04x:%02x:%02x.%d\n",
> + pcie->device_id.segment, pcie->device_id.bus,
> + pcie->device_id.slot, pcie->device_id.function);
Hmm... please correct if I'm wrong, but an error happened at PCI, and also a
kernel bug that prevented it to get the proper PCI device...
IMHO, the message here should be stronger, and likely printed via pr_err().
> + return;
> }
> + if (pcie->validation_bits & CPER_PCIE_VALID_AER_INFO)
> + cper_print_aer(dev, gdata->error_severity,
> + (struct aer_capability_regs *) pcie->aer_info);
> + pci_dev_put(dev);
> #endif
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_errprint.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_errprint.c
> index 3ea5173..34d96e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_errprint.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_errprint.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,9 @@
>
> #include "aerdrv.h"
>
> +#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> +#include <trace/events/ras.h>
> +
> #define AER_AGENT_RECEIVER 0
> #define AER_AGENT_REQUESTER 1
> #define AER_AGENT_COMPLETER 2
> @@ -194,6 +197,8 @@ void aer_print_error(struct pci_dev *dev, struct aer_err_info *info)
> if (info->id && info->error_dev_num > 1 && info->id == id)
> printk("%s"" Error of this Agent(%04x) is reported first\n",
> prefix, id);
> + trace_aer_event(dev_name(&dev->dev), (info->status & ~info->mask),
> + info->severity);
> }
>
> void aer_print_port_info(struct pci_dev *dev, struct aer_err_info *info)
> @@ -217,12 +222,13 @@ int cper_severity_to_aer(int cper_severity)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cper_severity_to_aer);
>
> -void cper_print_aer(const char *prefix, int cper_severity,
> +void cper_print_aer(struct pci_dev *dev, int cper_severity,
> struct aer_capability_regs *aer)
> {
> int aer_severity, layer, agent, status_strs_size, tlp_header_valid = 0;
> u32 status, mask;
> const char **status_strs;
> + char *prefix = NULL;
>
> aer_severity = cper_severity_to_aer(cper_severity);
> if (aer_severity == AER_CORRECTABLE) {
> @@ -259,5 +265,7 @@ void cper_print_aer(const char *prefix, int cper_severity,
> *(tlp + 8), *(tlp + 15), *(tlp + 14),
> *(tlp + 13), *(tlp + 12));
> }
> + trace_aer_event(dev_name(&dev->dev), (status & ~mask),
> + aer_severity);
> }
> #endif
> diff --git a/include/linux/aer.h b/include/linux/aer.h
> index 544abdb..7b86dc6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/aer.h
> +++ b/include/linux/aer.h
> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static inline int pci_cleanup_aer_uncorrect_error_status(struct pci_dev *dev)
> }
> #endif
>
> -extern void cper_print_aer(const char *prefix, int cper_severity,
> +extern void cper_print_aer(struct pci_dev *dev, int cper_severity,
> struct aer_capability_regs *aer);
> extern int cper_severity_to_aer(int cper_severity);
> extern void aer_recover_queue(int domain, unsigned int bus, unsigned int devfn,
>
After addressing the above:
Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
Cheers,
Mauro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
