Re: [Patch v4 08/12] memory-hotplug: remove memmap of sparse-vmemmap

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Wu,

Sorry to make noise here. Please see below. :)

On 12/03/2012 10:23 AM, Jianguo Wu wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jianguo Wu<wujianguo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu<jiang.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  include/linux/mm.h  |    1 +
  mm/sparse-vmemmap.c |  231 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  mm/sparse.c         |    3 +-
  3 files changed, 234 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 5657670..1f26af5 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -1642,6 +1642,7 @@ int vmemmap_populate(struct page *start_page, unsigned long pages, int node);
  void vmemmap_populate_print_last(void);
  void register_page_bootmem_memmap(unsigned long section_nr, struct page *map,
  				  unsigned long size);
+void vmemmap_free(struct page *memmap, unsigned long nr_pages);

  enum mf_flags {
  	MF_COUNT_INCREASED = 1<<  0,
diff --git a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
index 1b7e22a..748732d 100644
--- a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
+++ b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
@@ -29,6 +29,10 @@
  #include<asm/pgalloc.h>
  #include<asm/pgtable.h>

+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
+#include<asm/tlbflush.h>
+#endif
+
  /*
   * Allocate a block of memory to be used to back the virtual memory map
   * or to back the page tables that are used to create the mapping.
@@ -224,3 +228,230 @@ void __init sparse_mem_maps_populate_node(struct page **map_map,
  		vmemmap_buf_end = NULL;
  	}
  }
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
+
+#define PAGE_INUSE 0xFD
+
+static void vmemmap_free_pages(struct page *page, int order)
+{
+	struct zone *zone;
+	unsigned long magic;
+
+	magic = (unsigned long) page->lru.next;
+	if (magic == SECTION_INFO || magic == MIX_SECTION_INFO) {
+		put_page_bootmem(page);
+
+		zone = page_zone(page);
+		zone_span_writelock(zone);
+		zone->present_pages++;
+		zone_span_writeunlock(zone);
+		totalram_pages++;

Seems that we have different ways to handle pages allocated by bootmem
or by regular allocator. Is the checking way in [PATCH 09/12] available
here ?

+	/* bootmem page has reserved flag */
+	if (PageReserved(page)) {
......
+	}

If so, I think we can just merge these two functions.

+	} else
+		free_pages((unsigned long)page_address(page), order);
+}
+
+static void free_pte_table(pmd_t *pmd)
+{
+	pte_t *pte, *pte_start;
+	int i;
+
+	pte_start = (pte_t *)pmd_page_vaddr(*pmd);
+	for (i = 0; i<  PTRS_PER_PTE; i++) {
+		pte = pte_start + i;
+		if (pte_val(*pte))
+			return;
+	}
+
+	/* free a pte talbe */
+	vmemmap_free_pages(pmd_page(*pmd), 0);
+	spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
+	pmd_clear(pmd);
+	spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
+}
+
+static void free_pmd_table(pud_t *pud)
+{
+	pmd_t *pmd, *pmd_start;
+	int i;
+
+	pmd_start = (pmd_t *)pud_page_vaddr(*pud);
+	for (i = 0; i<  PTRS_PER_PMD; i++) {
+		pmd = pmd_start + i;
+		if (pmd_val(*pmd))
+			return;
+	}
+
+	/* free a pmd talbe */
+	vmemmap_free_pages(pud_page(*pud), 0);
+	spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
+	pud_clear(pud);
+	spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
+}
+
+static void free_pud_table(pgd_t *pgd)
+{
+	pud_t *pud, *pud_start;
+	int i;
+
+	pud_start = (pud_t *)pgd_page_vaddr(*pgd);
+	for (i = 0; i<  PTRS_PER_PUD; i++) {
+		pud = pud_start + i;
+		if (pud_val(*pud))
+			return;
+	}
+
+	/* free a pud table */
+	vmemmap_free_pages(pgd_page(*pgd), 0);
+	spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
+	pgd_clear(pgd);
+	spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
+}

All the free_xxx_table() are very similar to the functions in
[PATCH 09/12]. Could we reuse them anyway ?

+
+static int split_large_page(pte_t *kpte, unsigned long address, pte_t *pbase)
+{
+	struct page *page = pmd_page(*(pmd_t *)kpte);
+	int i = 0;
+	unsigned long magic;
+	unsigned long section_nr;
+
+	__split_large_page(kpte, address, pbase);

Is this patch going to replace [PATCH 08/12] ?

If so, __split_large_page() was added and exported in [PATCH 09/12],
then we should move it here, right ?

If not, free_map_bootmem() and __kfree_section_memmap() were changed in
[PATCH 08/12], and we need to handle this.

+	__flush_tlb_all();
+
+	magic = (unsigned long) page->lru.next;
+	if (magic == SECTION_INFO) {
+		section_nr = pfn_to_section_nr(page_to_pfn(page));
+		while (i<  PTRS_PER_PMD) {
+			page++;
+			i++;
+			get_page_bootmem(section_nr, page, SECTION_INFO);
+		}
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void vmemmap_pte_remove(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end)
+{
+	pte_t *pte;
+	unsigned long next;
+	void *page_addr;
+
+	pte = pte_offset_kernel(pmd, addr);
+	for (; addr<  end; pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
+		next = (addr + PAGE_SIZE)&  PAGE_MASK;
+		if (next>  end)
+			next = end;
+
+		if (pte_none(*pte))
+			continue;
+		if (IS_ALIGNED(addr, PAGE_SIZE)&&
+		    IS_ALIGNED(next, PAGE_SIZE)) {
+			vmemmap_free_pages(pte_page(*pte), 0);
+			spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
+			pte_clear(&init_mm, addr, pte);
+			spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
+		} else {
+			/*
+			 * Removed page structs are filled with 0xFD.
+			 */
+			memset((void *)addr, PAGE_INUSE, next - addr);
+			page_addr = page_address(pte_page(*pte));
+
+			if (!memchr_inv(page_addr, PAGE_INUSE, PAGE_SIZE)) {
+				spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
+				pte_clear(&init_mm, addr, pte);
+				spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
+	free_pte_table(pmd);
+	__flush_tlb_all();
+}
+
+static void vmemmap_pmd_remove(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end)
+{
+	unsigned long next;
+	pmd_t *pmd;
+
+	pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
+	for (; addr<  end; addr = next, pmd++) {
+		next = pmd_addr_end(addr, end);
+		if (pmd_none(*pmd))
+			continue;
+
+		if (cpu_has_pse) {
+			unsigned long pte_base;
+
+			if (IS_ALIGNED(addr, PMD_SIZE)&&
+			    IS_ALIGNED(next, PMD_SIZE)) {
+				vmemmap_free_pages(pmd_page(*pmd),
+						   get_order(PMD_SIZE));
+				spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
+				pmd_clear(pmd);
+				spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
+				continue;
+			}
+
+			/*
+			 * We use 2M page, but we need to remove part of them,
+			 * so split 2M page to 4K page.
+			 */
+			pte_base = get_zeroed_page(GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOTRACK);
+			if (!pte_base) {
+				WARN_ON(1);
+				continue;
+			}
+
+			split_large_page((pte_t *)pmd, addr, (pte_t *)pte_base);
+			__flush_tlb_all();
+
+			spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
+			pmd_populate_kernel(&init_mm, pmd, (pte_t *)pte_base);
+			spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
+		}
+
+		vmemmap_pte_remove(pmd, addr, next);
+	}
+
+	free_pmd_table(pud);
+	__flush_tlb_all();
+}
+
+static void vmemmap_pud_remove(pgd_t *pgd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end)
+{
+	unsigned long next;
+	pud_t *pud;
+
+	pud = pud_offset(pgd, addr);
+	for (; addr<  end; addr = next, pud++) {
+		next = pud_addr_end(addr, end);
+		if (pud_none(*pud))
+			continue;
+
+		vmemmap_pmd_remove(pud, addr, next);
+	}
+
+	free_pud_table(pgd);
+	__flush_tlb_all();
+}
+
+void vmemmap_free(struct page *memmap, unsigned long nr_pages)
+{
+	unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)memmap;
+	unsigned long end = (unsigned long)(memmap + nr_pages);
+	unsigned long next;
+
+	for (; addr<  end; addr = next) {
+		pgd_t *pgd = pgd_offset_k(addr);
+
+		next = pgd_addr_end(addr, end);
+		if (!pgd_present(*pgd))
+			continue;
+
+		vmemmap_pud_remove(pgd, addr, next);
+		sync_global_pgds(addr, next - 1);
+	}
+}
+#endif
diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
index fac95f2..4060229 100644
--- a/mm/sparse.c
+++ b/mm/sparse.c
@@ -615,10 +615,11 @@ static inline struct page *kmalloc_section_memmap(unsigned long pnum, int nid,
  }
  static void __kfree_section_memmap(struct page *memmap, unsigned long nr_pages)
  {
-	return; /* XXX: Not implemented yet */
+	vmemmap_free(memmap, nr_pages);
  }
  static void free_map_bootmem(struct page *page, unsigned long nr_pages)

In the latest kernel, this line was:
static void free_map_bootmem(struct page *memmap, unsigned long nr_pages)

  {
+	vmemmap_free(page, nr_pages);
  }
  #else
  static struct page *__kmalloc_section_memmap(unsigned long nr_pages)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux