On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 11:53 +0000, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ACPI_EXCEPTION() already appends a newline, so there is no
> need for the failed _DCK messaged to include one too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/dock.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/dock.c b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
> index 88eb143..a873c6b 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/dock.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
> @@ -475,7 +475,7 @@ static void handle_dock(struct dock_station *ds, int dock)
> status = acpi_evaluate_object(ds->handle, "_DCK", &arg_list, &buffer);
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && status != AE_NOT_FOUND)
> ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "%s - failed to execute"
> - " _DCK\n", (char *)name_buffer.pointer));
> + " _DCK", (char *)name_buffer.pointer));
Hi Colin,
In Rafael's linux-pm tree, this message has been changed to the
following. So, this patch is not necessary.
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && status != AE_NOT_FOUND)
acpi_handle_err(ds->handle, "Failed to execute _DCK (0x%x)\n",
status);
Thanks,
-Toshi
>
> kfree(buffer.pointer);
> kfree(name_buffer.pointer);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
