Re: [PATCH] acpi_system_write_wakeup_device(): fix error check for unsigned variable.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday, November 22, 2012 01:05:30 AM Cyril Roelandt wrote:
> On 11/21/2012 01:44 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Saturday, November 17, 2012 02:54:23 AM Cyril Roelandt wrote:
> >> The LEN variable is unsigned, therefore checking whether it is less than 0 is
> >> useless.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Cyril Roelandt<tipecaml@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/acpi/proc.c |    2 --
> >>   1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/proc.c b/drivers/acpi/proc.c
> >> index 27adb09..37871a7 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/acpi/proc.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/proc.c
> >> @@ -366,8 +366,6 @@ acpi_system_write_wakeup_device(struct file *file,
> >>
> >>   	if (len>  4)
> >>   		len = 4;
> >> -	if (len<  0)
> >> -		return -EFAULT;
> >
> > I would prefer to check if count<  0 instead.
> >
> 
> 
> count has type size_t, so it is also an unsigned variable. I think that 
> acpi_system_write_wakeup_device really cannot be called with a "count" 
> parameter that is less than 0.

OK

So I suppose we can just drop len entirely and replace it with count, right?
[And drop the < 0 check too.]

Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux