At 11/20/2012 02:58 PM, Jaegeuk Hanse Wrote:
> On 11/20/2012 02:55 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> At 11/20/2012 02:22 PM, Jaegeuk Hanse Wrote:
>>> On 11/01/2012 05:44 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
>>>> From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> Currently __remove_section for SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP does nothing. But
>>>> even if
>>>> we use SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP, we can unregister the memory_section.
>>>>
>>>> So the patch add unregister_memory_section() into __remove_section().
>>> Hi Yasuaki,
>>>
>>> In order to review this patch, I should dig sparse memory codes in
>>> advance. But I have some confuse of codes. Why need encode/decode mem
>>> map instead of set mem_map to ms->section_mem_map directly?
>> The memmap is aligned, and the low bits are zero. We store some
>> information
>> in these bits. So we need to encode/decode memmap here.
>
> Hi Congyang,
>
> Thanks for you reponse. But I mean why return (unsigned long)(mem_map -
> (section_nr_to_pfn(pnum))); in function sparse_encode_mem_map, and then
> return ((struct page *)coded_mem_map) + section_nr_to_pfn(pnum); in
> funtion sparse_decode_mem_map instead of just store mem_map in
> ms->section_mep_map directly.
I don't know why. I try to find the reason, but I don't find any
place to use the pfn stored in the mem_map except in the decode
function. Maybe the designer doesn't want us to access the mem_map
directly.
Thanks
Wen Congyang
>
> Regards,
> Jaegeuk
>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Wen Congyang
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Jaegeuk
>>>
>>>> CC: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> CC: Jiang Liu <liuj97@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> CC: Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> CC: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> CC: Wen Congyang <wency@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 13 ++++++++-----
>>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>>>> index ca07433..66a79a7 100644
>>>> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>>>> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>>>> @@ -286,11 +286,14 @@ static int __meminit __add_section(int nid,
>>>> struct zone *zone,
>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
>>>> static int __remove_section(struct zone *zone, struct mem_section
>>>> *ms)
>>>> {
>>>> - /*
>>>> - * XXX: Freeing memmap with vmemmap is not implement yet.
>>>> - * This should be removed later.
>>>> - */
>>>> - return -EBUSY;
>>>> + int ret = -EINVAL;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!valid_section(ms))
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = unregister_memory_section(ms);
>>>> +
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> }
>>>> #else
>>>> static int __remove_section(struct zone *zone, struct mem_section
>>>> *ms)
>>>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
