On Sunday, November 18, 2012 05:55:39 PM Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 12:24:45PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Well, maybe there is one. Perhaps we can make acpi_platform_notify() > > call acpi_bind_one() upfront and only if that fails, do the whole > > type->find_device() dance? Of course, acpi_bind_one() would need to > > be modified slightly too, like in the patch below. > > > > If we did that, acpi_i2c_add_device() would only need to assign acpi_handle > > as appropriate before calling i2c_new_device() (and analogously for SPI). > > > > What do you think? > > This is certainly better than the thing we use currently. It makes adding > I2C and SPI support much shorter and simpler. If others don't object I > would suggest that we switch to use this method. OK, thanks. The first of the following two patches is a slightly modified version of the one that you commented. Patch [2/2] implements the idea for platform devices and since it modifies struct platform_device_info, I'm adding a CC to Greg. The patches are on top of current linux-pm.git/linux-next. It looks like we may be able to use this approach for PCI too, in which case the whole .find_device() stuff won't be necessary any more. Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
