On Friday, November 16, 2012 10:09:34 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 09:02:36PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Ah, that's what's called by acpi_dev_get_resources(). But what about writing
> > it this way:
> >
> > static int acpi_i2c_find_child_address(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data)
> > {
> >
> > if (ares->type == ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_SERIAL_BUS) {
> > struct acpi_resource_i2c_serialbus *sb;
> >
> > sb = &ares->data.i2c_serial_bus;
> > if (sb->type == ACPI_RESOURCE_SERIAL_TYPE_I2C) {
> > struct acpi_i2c_find *i2c_find = data;
> >
> > if (sb->slave_address == i2c_find->addr)
> > i2c_find->found = true;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > /* Tell the ACPI core to skip this resource. */
> > return 1;
> > }
>
> Not a problem at all, I'll do it like above and also with the SPI case.
> I'll wait til tomorrow for more comments and post v3 unless there are
> objections.
OK, thanks!
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
