Hi Rafael,
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 11:09:03 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, November 15, 2012 01:03:17 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > ACPI 5 introduced I2cSerialBus resource that makes it possible to enumerate
> > and configure the I2C slave devices behind the I2C controller. This patch
> > adds helper functions to support I2C slave enumeration.
> >
> > An ACPI enabled I2C controller driver only needs to call acpi_i2c_register_devices()
> > in order to get its slave devices enumerated, created and bound to the
> > corresponding ACPI handle.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Are there any objections against this patch or comments?
>
> Worfram? Jean? Ben?
I am no longer maintaining the i2c subsystem and will not have the time
to look deeply into this. All I can say is that I very happy to see
this finally happen. Maybe with ACPI 5.0 we will finally be done with
resource conflicts plaguing many systems for several years now.
I took a quick look, and the only thing which seems suspicious is this
function:
> +static int acpi_i2c_find_child_address(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data)
> +{
> + struct acpi_resource_i2c_serialbus *sb;
> + struct acpi_i2c_find *i2c_find = data;
> +
> + if (ares->type != ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_SERIAL_BUS)
> + return 1;
> +
> + sb = &ares->data.i2c_serial_bus;
> + if (sb->type != ACPI_RESOURCE_SERIAL_TYPE_I2C)
> + return 1;
> +
> + if (sb->slave_address == i2c_find->addr)
The 7-bit and 10-bit address maps overlap, so the above isn't enough.
You must compare the addresses _and_ sb->access_mode with
i2c_find->access_mode (which needs to be added and filled properly.)
> + i2c_find->found = true;
> +
> + return 1;
> +}
Plus, it seems odd that this function always returns 1.
--
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
