At 11/08/2012 05:58 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki Wrote: > On Thursday, November 08, 2012 05:33:43 PM Wen Congyang wrote: >> Hi, Rafael J. Wysocki >> >> At 11/06/2012 10:05 PM, Dan Carpenter Wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 10:10:11AM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote: >>>> At 11/06/2012 02:11 AM, Dan Carpenter Wrote: >>>>> Hello Wen Congyang, >>>>> >>>>> The patch 306859f13dc1: "acpi_memhotplug.c: don't allow to eject the >>>>> memory device if it is being used" from Nov 3, 2012, leads to the >>>>> following Smatch warning: >>>>> drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c:367 acpi_memory_remove_memory() >>>>> warn: inconsistent returns mutex:&mem_device->list_lock: >>>>> locked (357,361) unlocked (367) >>>> >>>> Thanks for pointing it out. >>>> >>>> The patch 306859f13dc1 is in akpm's tree, and it conflicts with another >>>> patch in linux-pm's tree. So Andrew Morton drops them. >>>> >>>> I will resend them based on linux-pm's next tree. >>> >>> Ok. Today's linux-next version 85fcb3758c10e "ACPI / memory-hotplug: >>> introduce a mutex lock to protect the list in acpi_memory_device" >>> has a similar problem and should be fixed as well. >> >> This patch is in pm tree, and there is one problem. Should I resend them? > > Yes, please. > > Please also let me know which commits in linux-pm.git/linux-next should be > replaced with the new versions. OK. I will write it in the patches. Thanks Wen Congyang > > Thanks, > Rafael > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
