On Tuesday 23 of October 2012 03:27:27 Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 05:40:36PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > not sure if there's something weirdly subtle happening here, but > > this looks like a straightforward simplification. > > There is - it provides a hint to lockdep, but it should probably have a > comment explaining it. See > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14553 I wonder if it still is needed, though? The way it worked was by providing a different key for the work item depending on which workqueue was to be used, but now we don't do anything like this any more. Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
