On 18/10/12 18:42, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >> As for 'perf', since Xen already provides a virtual PMU for HVM guests >> It's not clear why we would spend the effort to implement another >> mechanism for PV guests (instead of using the virtual PMU from a PVH guest). > > Would that allow one to evaluate the performance/bottlenecks that the > hypervisor might have? Not right now, no. But I don't so why it couldn't be possible. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
