On 10/17/2012 09:54 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
Could you do an audit for other pvops calls that have no users? If
the *only* user is lguest, we should talk about it, too...
I can do that - but I don't want to be hasty here. There is a bit of
danger here - for example the read_pmc (or read_tsc) is not in use right
now. But it might be when one starts looking at making perf be able to
analyze the hypervisor (hand-waving the implementation details). So while
removing read_pmc now sounds good, it might be needed in the future.
We do not keep a pvop around just because it "might be needed in the
future". That's just crazy.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
