Re: Discussion on device's runtime wake capability

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/10/2012 08:53 AM, Aaron Lu wrote:
> On 10/10/2012 04:48 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Tuesday 09 of October 2012 14:23:12 Aaron Lu wrote:
>>> BTW, _S0W seems to be a good hint whether the device supports run wake
>>> from ACPI's perspective.
>>
>> Yes, it is a _hint_.
> 
> And I think it is a better hint than _PRW.

I probably need to add that, devices only have _PRW are of cource
runtime wake capable. This is already handled in our current code.

Thanks,
Aaron

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux