On Monday, August 27, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote: > Currently, when we are trying to get the power state of an acpi device, > we will do the following: > If device is not power manageable, init its power state as its parent or > if it does not have a parent, init as D0; > If device is power manageable, evaluate _PSC and then refine with > acpi_power_get_inferred_state. > > But there exist some devices with _PSx defined, but no _PSC or _PRx. > It is power manageable, but the above method to get power state does > not cover this case and its power state will be UNKNOWN(255). > > So change the check of power manageable to whether _PSC and _PRx > defined. > > Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@xxxxxxxxx> Applied to the linux-next branch of the linux-pm.git tree. I think it should go to -stable too and therefore it would be good to have it in v3.6, so I'd like to push it to Linus for -rc5, if Len has no objections. Thanks, Rafael > --- > drivers/acpi/bus.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c > index 9628652..b564e6d 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c > @@ -207,7 +207,8 @@ static int __acpi_bus_get_power(struct acpi_device *device, int *state) > if (!device || !state) > return -EINVAL; > > - if (!device->flags.power_manageable) { > + if (!device->power.flags.explicit_get && > + !device->power.flags.power_resources) { > /* TBD: Non-recursive algorithm for walking up hierarchy. */ > *state = device->parent ? > device->parent->power.state : ACPI_STATE_D0; > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html