On 09/03/2012 05:16 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:46:00PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> This patch adds a pointer to the cpuidle_state array in the cpuidle_device >> structure. When the cpuidle_device is initialized, the pointer is assigned >> from the driver's cpuidle states array. >> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c | 1 + >> include/linux/cpuidle.h | 1 + >> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c >> index d6a533e..42b1a8a 100644 >> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c >> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c >> @@ -305,6 +305,7 @@ int cpuidle_enable_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev) >> return -EIO; >> if (!dev->state_count) >> dev->state_count = drv->state_count; >> + dev->states = drv->states; > > This should only be done when dev->state_count == 0 no? Right. In acpi/processor_idle.c, the state count for the device is initialized and I overwritten this value in all the cases, but this not right. I removed the initialization in acpi because it is pointless and moved this line to do the 'if' block as you mentioned. Thanks -- Daniel -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
