On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 01:05:11PM +0200, Peter De Schrijver wrote: > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:19:15PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > On 07/27/2012 01:28 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:45:57PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > >> Since commit 46bcfad7a819bd17ac4e831b04405152d59784ab, > > >> cpuidle: Single/Global registration of idle states > > >> > > >> we have a single registration for the cpuidle states which makes > > >> sense. But now two new architectures are coming: tegra3 and big.LITTLE. > > >> > > >> These architectures have different cpus with different caracteristics > > >> for power saving. High load => powerfull processors, idle => small processors. > > >> > > >> That implies different cpu latencies. > > >> > > >> This patchset present a simple way to keep the current behavior as introduced > > >> by Deepthi without breaking the drivers and add the possibility to specify a > > >> per cpu states. > > >> > > > Looks good! I will do some tests with this next week. > > > > Hi Peter, > > > > shall I consider adding your acked-by ? > > > > You can. I don't see any problem with the code as such (besides the race). > > > Did you have time to test the patchset ? > > > > I haven't had time no :( I was on holiday most of august and had some other > things to take care of last week :(. Working on it now. > I did some preliminary testing, besides the issues I posted earlier. It looks all good here. Cheers, Peter. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
