On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 02:03:31AM +0200, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> Calling this function no longer makes sense as /proc/acpi/event
> is being removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxx>
> :
> drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c | 4 ----
> :
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
> index c4c1a54..2fac1c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
> @@ -773,8 +773,6 @@ static void acpi_fujitsu_notify(struct acpi_device *device, u32 event)
> else
> set_lcd_level(newb);
> }
> - acpi_bus_generate_proc_event(fujitsu->dev,
> - ACPI_VIDEO_NOTIFY_INC_BRIGHTNESS, 0);
> keycode = KEY_BRIGHTNESSUP;
> } else if (oldb > newb) {
> if (disable_brightness_adjust != 1) {
> @@ -783,8 +781,6 @@ static void acpi_fujitsu_notify(struct acpi_device *device, u32 event)
> else
> set_lcd_level(newb);
> }
> - acpi_bus_generate_proc_event(fujitsu->dev,
> - ACPI_VIDEO_NOTIFY_DEC_BRIGHTNESS, 0);
> keycode = KEY_BRIGHTNESSDOWN;
> }
> break;
Presumedly the intention here is for these events to be delivered via the
input layer after the removal of /proc/acpi/event (as is done later in the
above function).
If that's the case, then:
Acked-by: Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Regards
jonathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
