On Monday, July 30, 2012, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 09:31:53PM +0200, Witold Szczeponik wrote: > > the aim is to select a PNP ACPI option where resources can be disabled > > (or are not needed). E.g., the parallel port of the 600E can be used > > with and without IRQ lines. The means to allow for this is to use the > > sysfs interface to select disabled resources (just like any other > > resource value). In https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/7/3/41, I used the > > following example: > > > > echo disable > /sys/bus/pnp/devices/$device/resources > > echo clear > /sys/bus/pnp/devices/$device/resources > > echo set irq disabled > /sys/bus/pnp/devices/$device/resources > > echo fill > /sys/bus/pnp/devices/$device/resources > > echo activate > /sys/bus/pnp/devices/$device/resources > > > > The third line is made possible by the patch series. All other > > lines are already implemented. > > Shouldn't this be rather "disable_irq" or something which is a single > word and thus would simplify parsing a lot? Or just "irq", which isn't going to be confused with anything else it seems. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
