On 三, 2012-07-25 at 22:24 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > First, it would be good to write something about the motivation here. > > Second, I suppose that there are no users of the code in question who > rely on the current behavior except for ACPI. If that is the case, it > should be state in the changelog too, because that's an important piece > of information for whoever wants to understand what's going on. If > that is not the case, however, you should describe how your changes will > affect the users in question, so that it's clear enough that no regressions > will result from this change. > yep, but I think I should state this in the previous patch, when introducing .get_trend() callback. This patch just does some cleanups. thanks, rui -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
