On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 04:37:14PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 12:52:43AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 02:41:56PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > > > A recent build for KVM on x86 resulted in the following build error: > > > > > > drivers/acpi/sleep.c:60:13: warning: ‘pwr_btn_event_pending’ defined but not > > > +used [-Wunused-variable] > > > > > > This patch silences this error. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c > > > index 8856102..18347aa 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c > > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c > > > @@ -57,7 +57,9 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(gts, "Enable evaluation of _GTS on suspend."); > > > MODULE_PARM_DESC(bfs, "Enable evaluation of _BFS on resume".); > > > > > > static u8 sleep_states[ACPI_S_STATE_COUNT]; > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP > > > static bool pwr_btn_event_pending; > > > +#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP */ > > > > __maybe_unused ? > > Are the compiler and linker smart enough to get rid of the storage in > case it really isn't used? (Not that the storage for a bool is worth > worrying about, but...) GCC with optimization enabled will get rid of the storage even without __maybe_unused. -- Kirill A. Shutemov -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
