Hi, On Tuesday, July 17, 2012, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Rafael, Daniel, > > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> writes: > > > Hi all, > > > > All of the changes I'd like to include into the first PM pull request during > > the v3.6 merge window, except maybe for one or two patches I know are in the > > works, is on the 'linux-next' branch of the linux-pm.git tree now. The summary > > of those changes is appended. If anyone finds any of them objectionable, > > please let me know ASAP. Also please let me know if you have any power > > management patches you'd like me to take for v3.6. > > > > Could someone please clarify the status of the coupled CPUidle series? > > There's a version of these in Daniels cpuidle-next branch and there's a > version of these in Len's next branch (included in linux-next), but I'm > still not entirely sure which branch is going upstream and which branch > has the latest version (but I think Daniel's is the latest) Colin says that the commits in the Len's tree match his latest version, so I think those commits should be merged, since they have been present in that tree since the 3.5 merge window. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
