Re: [PATCH 4/5] acpi : remove power from acpi_processor_cx structure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday, July 13, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 07/13/2012 02:17 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:03:45PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> Remove the power field as it is not used.
> >>
> > It looks to be used in drivers/xen/xen-acpi-processor.c.
> > 
> > I could emulate some value and stick it in there.. but I am
> > more curious - what is the intent of this value?
> 
> At the first glance, this value is the power consumption of the
> specified state. I am not sure all acpi returns a correct value.
> 
> I can imagine the power should be copied to the cpuidle_state structure
> to the power field where it is used by the governor to choose the better
> C-state. As it is not specified, cpuidle will assume the C-State N
> consumes less than the C-State N-1.
> 
> If we want to add the power consumption we should also set the
> 'power_specified' flag for the driver, but that could change the
> behavior of the cpuidle driver.
> 
> Anyway, IMO, this field is useless for this structure and should be
> specified later, if that makes sense, directly in the cpuidle_state
> structure like the other drivers do.
> 
> If nobody complains, I will remove the field also from Xen and resend
> this patch.

Please do.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux