On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 01:59:19PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > This is similar than what is done for other busses before (PCI, I2C, SPI, > platform). It reduces a lot of unnecessary boilerplate code from modules. > > We also remove following redundant check on few drivers: > > if (acpi_disabled) > return -ENODEV; > > as this same check is already done at the beginning of > acpi_bus_register_driver(). > > I think these should all go via ACPI tree because they all depend on the > first patch which adds the macro to the ACPI subsystem. Len, do you have any comments? Could you consider merging these patches? Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
