On Thursday, July 12, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> Remove the latency_ticks field as it is not used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks for the patches, but can you please repost them to
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx so that they are included into the kernel.org
Patchwork? They will be much easier to review and handle then.
And please CC linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for all ACPI-related patches in the
future.
Thanks,
Rafael
> ---
> drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c | 2 --
> include/acpi/processor.h | 1 -
> 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> index b894627..9ef007d 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> @@ -583,7 +583,6 @@ static void acpi_processor_power_verify_c3(struct acpi_processor *pr,
> */
> cx->valid = 1;
>
> - cx->latency_ticks = cx->latency;
> /*
> * On older chipsets, BM_RLD needs to be set
> * in order for Bus Master activity to wake the
> @@ -616,7 +615,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_power_verify(struct acpi_processor *pr)
> if (!cx->address)
> break;
> cx->valid = 1;
> - cx->latency_ticks = cx->latency; /* Normalize latency */
> break;
>
> case ACPI_STATE_C3:
> diff --git a/include/acpi/processor.h b/include/acpi/processor.h
> index ac3bff6..19423c3 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/processor.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/processor.h
> @@ -59,7 +59,6 @@ struct acpi_processor_cx {
> u8 entry_method;
> u8 index;
> u32 latency;
> - u32 latency_ticks;
> u32 power;
> u32 usage;
> u64 time;
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
