On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:03:23 +0800
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> +static int is_pci_ata(struct device *dev)
> >> +{
> >> + struct pci_dev *pdev;
> >> +
> >> + if (!is_pci_dev(dev))
> >> + return 0;
> >> +
> >> + pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> >> +
> >> + if ((pdev->class >> 8) != PCI_CLASS_STORAGE_SATA &&
> >> + (pdev->class >> 8) != PCI_CLASS_STORAGE_IDE)
> >> + return 0;
> >
> > This needs a better name. It doesn't check if a device is PCI ATA or
> > anything of the sort, it checks if its probably a device in compatibility
> > mode. A lot of controllers will in fact report RAID class or similar in
> > native mode.
>
> How about compat_pci_ata?
Sounds reasonable. I'm not btw sure the test is entirely right, but I'm
not sure quite what you are trying to figure out from it and how ACPI
expects this mapping to work.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
