On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ps. Sorry for sending this request at the tails of the merge window --
> I'll try to be earlier next time.
Christ, not only is it after I really wanted to do -rc1 (held up by
the tty locking problems), but it doesn't even compile.
Find the bug (the compiler certainly did):
static inline int acpi_pm_device_sleep_state(struct device *d, int *p, int m)
{
if (p)
*p = ACPI_STATE_D0;
return (m >= ACPI_STATE_D0 && <= ACPI_STATE_D3) ? m : ACPI_STATE_D0;
}
and no, it wasn't a merge error. That's what it looks like in your tree.
The commit was done yesterday. It clearly had *zero* testing.
Looking more at the pull as a result of this, I notice that almost
every commit in that tree is from yesterday, and thus cleary cannot
have been in -next. I was going to just fix up the obvious one-liner
fixup, but looking at the bigger picture I'm going to say "3.6
material" for this whole thing.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
