On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> Seems reasonable. Although could this maybe be done more generically at >> the rtc infrastructure level instead of in the rtc-cmos driver? > > I think it could, but it can be moved to the RTC layer later too. I don't think there is much you can win by making it generic - the event has to be caught via the ACPI subsystem. Instead of calling pm_wakeup_event() directly you could add a generic RTC function to do the exact same thing, but I don't see the need to hide wakeup event generation in a RTC-level API. Rafael, is this OK for 3.5? Thanks, Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
