On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 04:59:22PM -0700, Sarah Sharp wrote: > > > Only the xHCI host controller will have the port power off mechanism. > > > > You're only talking about the upcoming Intel implementation, right? > > Yes. The port power off mechanism is an Intel specific ACPI call. > AFAIK, there isn't anyone else who is going to have this mechanism. That's not fair, you don't know what other vendors are going to do in their controllers, or their system firmware, to be able to accurately say this. > > > > And what about ports on the USB-2 "rate-matching" hubs that Intel now > > > > builds into its chipsets? > > > > > > For the Intel platform that has the port power off mechanism, there are > > > EHCI host controllers, but the port switch over changes *all* the USB > > > ports under xHCI. > > > > Leaving aside the matter of people who don't use the port switch-over, > > what about other platforms? > > I'm not sure about other future Intel chipsets, like server chipsets. > As I said, I don't think the port power off mechanism will save servers > a large percentage of their power budget. I don't think there's any > plans to add the port power off mechanism to EHCI. Power savings mean more in real dollars to server systems than to mobile systems. So don't be supprised to see this show up on some server systems, especially with the wide range of "custom" motherboards that people are creating for large "cloud" data centers. Never say never :) greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
