On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 09:22 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > Changed acpi_processor_hotplug_notify() to call ACPI _OST method
> > when ACPI-based CPU hotplug operation completed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@xxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c
> > index 0734086..5d9b5a8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c
> > @@ -701,9 +701,9 @@ static void acpi_processor_hotplug_notify(acpi_handle handle,
> > {
> > struct acpi_processor *pr;
> > struct acpi_device *device = NULL;
> > + u32 ost_code = ACPI_OST_SC_NON_SPECIFIC_FAILURE; /* default */
> > int result;
> >
> > -
> > switch (event) {
> > case ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK:
> > case ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK:
> > @@ -715,14 +715,18 @@ static void acpi_processor_hotplug_notify(acpi_handle handle,
> > if (!is_processor_present(handle))
> > break;
> >
> > - if (acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device)) {
> > - result = acpi_processor_device_add(handle, &device);
> > - if (result)
> > - printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX
> > - "Unable to add the device\n");
> > + if (!acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device))
> > + break;
> > +
> > + result = acpi_processor_device_add(handle, &device);
> > + if (result) {
> > + printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "Unable to add the device\n");
>
> You didn't add this problem, but since you're touching the code, I'll
> point it out. This message will look to the user like:
>
> ACPI: Unable to add the device
>
> which is useless. The user has no idea what device we're talking
> about or why we can't add it, so he can't *do* anything with the
> message. Almost every printk of a constant string has this problem.
> Using dev_err() instead of printk() would help a lot, as would
> including the error code (result). Of course, this would be a
> separate patch that would update all the messages in the driver at the
> same time.
I agree. I will put it as one of my future items. :)
Thanks,
-Toshi
> > break;
> > }
> > +
> > + ost_code = ACPI_OST_SC_SUCCESS;
> > break;
> > +
> > case ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST:
> > ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
> > "received ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST\n"));
> > @@ -736,15 +740,23 @@ static void acpi_processor_hotplug_notify(acpi_handle handle,
> > if (!pr) {
> > printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX
> > "Driver data is NULL, dropping EJECT\n");
> > - return;
> > + break;
> > }
> > +
> > + /* REVISIT: update when eject is supported */
> > + ost_code = ACPI_OST_SC_EJECT_NOT_SUPPORTED;
> > break;
> > +
> > default:
> > ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
> > "Unsupported event [0x%x]\n", event));
> > - break;
> > +
> > + /* non-hotplug event; possibly handled by other handler */
> > + return;
> > }
> >
> > + /* Inform firmware that the hotplug operation has completed */
> > + (void) acpi_evaluate_ost(handle, event, ost_code, NULL);
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 1.7.7.6
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
