于 2012/3/30 1:07, Luck, Tony 写道:
+ if (mem_err->validation_bits& CPER_MEM_VALID_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS)
+ m.addr = mem_err->physical_addr;
At the moment "addr" is the only useful value in this record ... so
if we find that we can't supply it because we don't know it - then the
record has no value, and we might as well not send it.
E.g. start the function with:
if (!(mem_err->validation_bits& CPER_MEM_VALID_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS))
return;
-Tony
But as Ying said before, in theory we need to support this scenario,
otherwise, I prefer to
add check condition out of this function, not here.
What's your opinion, Ying?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
