Bob?
On 02/04/2012 08:12 PM, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> As far as I can see, there are two small mem leaks in error paths of
> 'acpi_ps_get_next_field()' where we neglect to free the memory
> previously allocated to 'field'.
>
> I believe this patch should fix the leaks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/acpica/psargs.c | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> Note: Compile tested only.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/psargs.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/psargs.c
> index 5ac36ab..a683d66 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/psargs.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/psargs.c
> @@ -618,6 +618,7 @@ static union acpi_parse_object *acpi_ps_get_next_field(struct acpi_parse_state
>
> arg = acpi_ps_alloc_op(AML_INT_BYTELIST_OP);
> if (!arg) {
> + acpi_ps_free_op(field);
> return_PTR(NULL);
> }
>
> @@ -662,6 +663,7 @@ static union acpi_parse_object *acpi_ps_get_next_field(struct acpi_parse_state
> } else {
> arg = acpi_ps_alloc_op(AML_INT_NAMEPATH_OP);
> if (!arg) {
> + acpi_ps_free_op(field);
> return_PTR(NULL);
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
