On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, Lan Tianyu wrote: > >> hi alan: > >> Great thanks for your review. > >> But I still confuse about "You might as well add the child device pointer > >> into your new data structure." Could you help me to make it clear? :) > >> Do you mean add struct usb_device pointer toward the device attached to the > >> port in the > >> struct usb_hub_port? If yes,Why? > > > > Yes, that's what I mean. It's a natural thing to do; the child device > > is directly associated with the port. It's better than allocating a > > separate array for hdev->children. > OK. That' mean that I should replace the hdev->children with > port_data->child_device. > In the hub.c, the struct usb_hub_port can be visited and the child_device can be > accessed > directly. Out of hub.c, I should provide function to return child pointer. Is > that right? Right. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
