On 五, 2012-02-17 at 23:23 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Okay, agreed. > > so how about this? _PR3 equals D3_HOT support. > > Yes, I can agree with that. :-) > > > > > Hmm, how about set D3_COLD support if _PR3 exists, but leave a warning > > > > message if _OFF doesn't exist, for now? > > > > > > I don't think we need to set D3_COLD support at all. In fact, it is always > > > supported (as I said, if all power resources used by a device are off, the > > > device is in D3_COLD pretty much by definition). > > > > > Yeah, but it seems that Linux uses ACPI_D3 for both ACPICA D3_HOT and D3 > > (off). I'm generating a patch to remove ACPI_D3_COLD and introduce > > D3_HOT support in Linux kernel. > > That's a good idea in my opinion. Great. Patch will be sent out later. thanks, rui -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html