On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 08:17:11AM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote: > +#define reduction_pctg(cpu) \ > + per_cpu(cpufreq_thermal_reduction_pctg, phys_package_first_cpu(cpu)) I don't like using percentages here - we end up with the potential for several percentages to end up mapping to the same P state. I've sent a patch that replaces the percentage code with just stepping through P states instead. But otherwise, yes, this seems sensible. An open question is whether we should be doing the same on _PPC notifications. There's some vague evidence that Windows does. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
