Re: [PATCH 2/5] ACPI processor: Avoid WARN message on processor driver removal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday, January 17, 2012 12:02:39 PM Len Brown wrote:
> On 11/17/2011 05:36 PM, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> 
> > Only unregister acpi_idle driver if acpi_idle driver got
> > registered.
> > 
> > Also add a static acpi_idle_active variable for easy and nicer
> > checking whether acpi_idle_driver is active (as suggested by
> > Bjorn).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx>
> > CC: Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > CC: linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > CC: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c |   11 +++++++----
> >  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c
> > index 3a4fc0c..790623f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c
> > @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ static struct cpuidle_driver acpi_idle_driver = {
> >  	.name =		"acpi_idle",
> >  	.owner =	THIS_MODULE,
> >  };
> > +static int acpi_idle_active;
> >  
> >  #define INSTALL_NOTIFY_HANDLER		1
> >  #define UNINSTALL_NOTIFY_HANDLER	2
> > @@ -508,8 +509,7 @@ static int __cpuinit acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device)
> >  	acpi_processor_get_throttling_info(pr);
> >  	acpi_processor_get_limit_info(pr);
> >  
> > -
> > -	if (cpuidle_get_driver() == &acpi_idle_driver)
> > +	if (acpi_idle_active)
> >  		acpi_processor_power_init(pr, device);
> 
> 
> I think the old cold reads better than the new code,
> since I don't have to guess what "acpi_idle_active" means...
> 
> Perhaps you can use the existing mechanism where
> it is missing to guard the unregister and re-fresh?
With commit 46bcfad7a819bd17ac4e831b04405152d59784ab
Author: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Fri Oct 28 16:20:42 2011 +0530

    cpuidle: Single/Global registration of idle states

the offending unregistering line is not needed anymore at all
and a new patch would look similar to:
@@ -846,7 +848,8 @@ static void __exit acpi_processor_exit(void)
 
        acpi_bus_unregister_driver(&acpi_processor_driver);
 
-       cpuidle_unregister_driver(&acpi_idle_driver);
 
        return;
 }

I'll send something with Deepthi in CC to double check.

   Thomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux