Re: [PATCH 3/5] intel_idle: Split up and provide per CPU initialization func

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] intel_idle: Split up and provide per CPU initialization func
From: Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 06:06:19 -0500
Cc: linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1321569421-46220-4-git-send-email-trenn@suse.de>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.22) Gecko/20110906 Fedora/3.1.14-1.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.14

On 11/17/2011 05:36 PM, Thomas Renninger wrote:

> Function split up, should have no functional change


benefit?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] intel_idle: Split up and provide per CPU initialization func
  - From: Thomas Renninger

References:
- [PATCH 3/5] intel_idle: Split up and provide per CPU initialization func
  - From: Thomas Renninger

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/5] ACPI processor: Avoid WARN message on processor driver removal
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 5/5] ACPI processor: Remove unneeded variable passed by acpi_processor_hotadd_init
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 3/5] intel_idle: Split up and provide per CPU initialization func
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 3/5] intel_idle: Split up and provide per CPU initialization func
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux IBM ACPI] [Linux Power Management] [Linux Kernel] [Linux Laptop] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Device Mapper] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux