On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 01:36:45PM +0100, Corentin Chary wrote: > On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Seth Forshee > <seth.forshee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 03:12:38PM +0100, Corentin Chary wrote: > >> On these laptops, the ACPI video is not functional, and very unlikely > >> to be fixed by the vendor. Note that intel_backlight works for some > >> of these laptops, and the backlight from samsung-laptop always work. > >> > >> The good news is that newer laptops have functional ACPI video device > >> and won't end up growing this list. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Corentin Chary <corentincj@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> > >> Could the concerned people test this patch and check that it correctly > >> disable the acpi_video backlight ? > >> > >> drivers/acpi/video_detect.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> 1 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c b/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c > >> index 45d8097..376bce2 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c > >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c > >> @@ -132,6 +132,44 @@ find_video(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv) > >> return AE_OK; > >> } > >> > >> +/* Force to use vendor driver when the ACPI device is known to be > >> + * buggy */ > >> +static int video_detect_force_vendor(const struct dmi_system_id *d) > >> +{ > >> + acpi_video_support |= ACPI_VIDEO_BACKLIGHT_DMI_VENDOR; > >> + return 0; > >> +} > >> + > >> +static struct dmi_system_id video_detect_dmi_table[] = { > >> + { > >> + .callback = video_detect_force_vendor, > >> + .ident = "N150P", > >> + .matches = { > >> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD."), > >> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "N150P"), > >> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "N150P"), > >> + }, > >> + }, > >> + { > >> + .callback = video_detect_force_vendor, > >> + .ident = "N145P/N250P/N260P", > >> + .matches = { > >> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD."), > >> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "N145P/N250P/N260P"), > >> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "N145P/N250P/N260P"), > >> + }, > >> + }, > >> + { > >> + .callback = video_detect_force_vendor, > >> + .ident = "N150/N210/N220", > >> + .matches = { > >> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD."), > >> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "N150/N210/N220"), > >> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "N150/N210/N220"), > >> + }, > >> + }, > >> +}; > >> + > > > > I don't see NF110/NF210/NF310 in this list. Was that an oversight? > > Ooops. Could you add it and try the patch, then send me lines you added ? > Thanks, Sure, but it won't be until next week. I'm travelling this week and don't have the machine with me. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html