Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Regression in 3.1 causes Xen to use wrong idle routine

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 04:59:10PM +0000, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 13/11/2011 03:46, "Len Brown" <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> >> The problem I see is that select_idle_routine() is called from
> >> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c and since Xen setup does not set pm_idle
> >> anymore, it can cause mwait_idle or amd_e400_idle functions to be selected.
> >> In testing it seem amd_e400_idle in PVM domU at least does not immediately
> >> cause
> >> problems, but mwait_idle just causes crashes. From the reports I have
> >> this may be related to older hypervisors (3.1 and older) not clearing the
> >> mwait
> >> capability. But overall there seems something wrong in the interaction.
> > 
> > Why is Xen advertising X86_FEATURE_MWAIT and then crashing
> > when the dom0 (or other guests) use what it advertises?
> > 
> > What versions of Xen have this bug?
> 
> Xen doesn't advertise MWAIT. Possibly Xen-pv_ops is lying to the rest of the
> kernel via the cpuid pv_ops hook. This would probably be because Xen is

I can't seem to find anything in there advertising the MWAIT feature.

> relying on the OSPM in dom0 kernel to parse out Cx/Px info which Xen itself
> *can* use.

The Cx/Px patches that would parse the Cx/Px and then percolate those up
to the hypervisor are in mainline. So that is not it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux