> What kind of failures are seen with this bug un-patched? > (and thus, what kind of urgency do distros have to back-port this fix?) Just noticed it was wrong when reading code - It hadn't caused me a problem - and in most cases I don't think there is an issue - since we actually round up all mappings to pages anyway, whether we have the size in bits or bytes will generally not make any difference. There might be some issues with addresses near the end of a page, where using 64 as bytes would mean addr+size overflows onto the next page, where addr+size/8 doesn't. But I haven't looked hard enough to see what would happen in this case. -Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
