On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 00:31 +0800, Thomas Renninger wrote: > On Thursday, September 29, 2011 11:59:08 PM Myron Stowe wrote: > > Late last year I submitted a patch series that re-factored some existing > > work that Huang Ying introduced adding support for accessing ACPI > > generic registers backed by Memory Mapped I/O (MMIO) while within > > interrupt context: > > Huang Ying's commit 15651291a2f8c11e7e6a42d8bfde7a213ff13262, > > My series: http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=128769263327206&w=2. > > Ying: What is your opinion about this patchset? I am OK with the patchset. We just need some testing. > One major change seem to be to use a mutex instead of a spinlock > which looks like a fix as the pre-mapping should never happen in > irq context. Sorry, where is the mutex? > I expect the rest is more or less the same, but double checking > by someone who is more involved in these code paths would be > great. Best Regards, Huang Ying -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
