On 11/3/11, Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 18:48 +0800, Rakib Mullick wrote: >> Calling pm-suspend might trigger a recursive lock in it's code path. In >> function acpi_hw_clear_acpi_status, > > As I replied at https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/22/6, I still don't think > there is a recursive lock. > > Or do you have a real test case to trigger the recursive lock you > mentioned? > As I said before, recursive lock trigger's on a modified kernel (when calling pm-suspend), not with the mainline kernel. If you think that, since it's not happening with original kernel, so we shouldn't go for fix - that's a different thing, I don't have any argue. But, the issue is on. Thanks, Rakib -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html