Hi! On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi All, > > There was a plan to organize a PM mini-summit during the KS 2011 in Prague, > but then I didn't follow up (which obviously is my fault) and lost track of > things when kernel.org and the KS servers went offline. So, apparently, > the KS organizers concluded that the PM mini-summit wasn't going to happen > after all and didn't add it to the schedule. > > Still, it appears to be possible to arrange a room for a PM meeting on > Sunday, Oct 23, if there are people wanting to attend. So, if you'd like > to take part in such a meeting, please let me know ASAP. I still do not know if I will be attendind, for various reasons. I will let you know asap. > > The topics I, personally, would like to discuss include: > - Per-device PM QoS Since the discussion about the PM QoS user space interface(s) are still going on I think this needs to be discussed. I would also add the following items: - PM QoS throughput constraints. How to handle a complex clock tree? What should the API (kernel, user) look like? - SmartReflex driver conversion. The current OMAP-only implementation needs to be converted to a generic driver, possibly in drivers/power. > - Propagation of wakeup events to user space vs system suspend > - Possibility of representing dependencies between devices through > "device links" (i.e. objects representing master-slave links between > devices) > - Idea of common "platform" bus type that may cover ACPI devices (like > battery, fans etc.), PNP devices and current platform devices in a > consistent way > - Freezer improvements > > Thanks, > Rafael > Thanks, Jean -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
