Lin Ming is looking at this now and will report soon. Bob > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Renninger [mailto:trenn@xxxxxxx] > Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 4:42 AM > To: lenb@xxxxxxxxxx; hpa@xxxxxxxxx; Lin, Ming M; Moore, Robert > Cc: eric.piel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; jnelson-suse@xxxxxxxxxxx; > devel@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; x86@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Implement overriding of arbitrary ACPI tables > via initrd > > Hi Len, Hi Robert, hi Lin, > > what's your opinion about these patches? > I just sent a tiny bug fix which slipped in when I did > last minute cleanups. > > Is the additional acpi_os_phys_table_override() function which > would be needed in ACPICA sources acceptable? > > I'd appreciate if the acpica adoption can be made by > acpica people, but if you give green light, I can also > re-write the first patch against acpica sources. > > As this needs syncing with acpica it would be great if the first > steps can be made, so that this can show up in 3.2 release. > > Thanks, > > Thomas > > On Wednesday, August 24, 2011 11:48:08 AM Thomas Renninger wrote: > > This patch series got some basic testing already (see patch 2 > changelog) and > > is based on latest 3.1-rc2 Linus kernel. > > > > The patches are separated into ACPICA parts (patch 1) and kernel > parts (patch 2). > > > > They are ready for integeration (if now objections should show up in > a review > > discussion) and it would be great if they can be added in Len's > latest acpi-test > > tree for broader testing. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Thomas > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" > in > > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
