Re: [PATCH] x86, ioapic: move acpi_get_override_irq to acpi.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri,  1 Apr 2011 17:44:46 +0200
Florian Mickler <florian@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


> 
> Hi Ingo,
> 
> Instead of exporting find_irq_entry, irq_trigger and irq_polarity, I added a 
> new helper function 'ioapic_get_irq(..)' and exported that. 
> 
> Also I did it as a seperate commit, since it is more of a cleanup and the other 
> commit is already tested... hope this is ok. 
> 
> Regards,
> Flo
> 

btw, include/linux/acpi.h:
120 
121 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC
122 extern int acpi_get_override_irq(u32 gsi, int *trigger, int *polarity);
123 #else
124 #define acpi_get_override_irq(gsi, trigger, polarity) (-1)
125 #endif

this shouldn't be needed anymore, as acpi_get_override_irq is now
independent of CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC (because of ioapic_get_irq having
a placeholder in the !CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC case)

But on the other hand, the code flow for the !CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC would
be kind of silly...  what's the rationale for mp_find_ioapic returning
0 in the !CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC case? And how do I check compilation
of !CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC?   It looks like it already has problems, as
mp_find_ioapic_pin is not stubbed out, or am I overlooking something?

Regards,
Flo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux