Re: 2.6.38-git18: Reported regressions from 2.6.37

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sunday, March 27, 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.37,
> for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
> If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
> 
> If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.37, please let us
> know either and we'll add them to the list.  Also, please let us know
> if any of the entries below are invalid.
> 
> Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply
> to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling
> the issue.
> 
> 
> Listed regressions statistics:
> 
>   Date          Total  Pending  Unresolved
>   ----------------------------------------
>   2011-03-27       88       26          26
>   2011-03-06       70       27          26
>   2011-02-21       51       18          17
>   2011-02-12       39       20          18
>   2011-02-03       19       11           7


I forgot to mention that the tracking of regressions from 2.6.36 is now closed
and the tracking of regressions from 2.6.38 is going to start after 2.6.39-rc1
has been released.

The meta-bug for the tracking of regressions from 2.6.38 is
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32012

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux