Re: [PATCH] pnpacpi: Better format error message

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 03:24:50PM +0100, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> On a system with empty _CRS method I see:
> pnp 00:0c: can't evaluate _CRS: 12311
> which is 0x3017, which would mean: AE_AML_INVALID_RESOURCE_TYPE
> 
> This patch would directly show: AE_AML_INVALID_RESOURCE_TYPE

The patch seems fine to me, but I question whether we need these
printks at all.  It seems pointless to have an empty _CRS method,
but it does seem legal, or at least debatable, so I'm not sure
that the message is telling us anything useful.

Bjorn

> Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx>
> CC: bjorn@xxxxxxxxxxx
> CC: lenb@xxxxxxxxxx
> CC: robert.moore@xxxxxxxxx
> 
> ---
> Corrected email address of Bjorn.
> 
>  drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c |   12 ++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6.37-master/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.37-master.orig/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c
> +++ linux-2.6.37-master/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c
> @@ -498,7 +498,8 @@ int pnpacpi_parse_allocated_resource(str
>  
>  	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
>  		if (status != AE_NOT_FOUND)
> -			dev_err(&dev->dev, "can't evaluate _CRS: %d", status);
> +			dev_err(&dev->dev, "can't evaluate _CRS: %s",
> +				acpi_format_exception(status));
>  		return -EPERM;
>  	}
>  	return 0;
> @@ -809,7 +810,8 @@ int __init pnpacpi_parse_resource_option
>  
>  	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
>  		if (status != AE_NOT_FOUND)
> -			dev_err(&dev->dev, "can't evaluate _PRS: %d", status);
> +			dev_err(&dev->dev, "can't evaluate _PRS: %s",
> +				acpi_format_exception(status));
>  		return -EPERM;
>  	}
>  	return 0;
> @@ -876,7 +878,8 @@ int pnpacpi_build_resource_template(stru
>  	status = acpi_walk_resources(handle, METHOD_NAME__CRS,
>  				     pnpacpi_count_resources, &res_cnt);
>  	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> -		dev_err(&dev->dev, "can't evaluate _CRS: %d\n", status);
> +		dev_err(&dev->dev, "can't evaluate _CRS: %s\n",
> +			acpi_format_exception(status));
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  	if (!res_cnt)
> @@ -891,7 +894,8 @@ int pnpacpi_build_resource_template(stru
>  				     pnpacpi_type_resources, &resource);
>  	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
>  		kfree(buffer->pointer);
> -		dev_err(&dev->dev, "can't evaluate _CRS: %d\n", status);
> +		dev_err(&dev->dev, "can't evaluate _CRS: %s\n",
> +			acpi_format_exception(status));
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  	/* resource will pointer the end resource now */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux