On Friday, February 18, 2011 07:47:07 pm Mike Travis wrote:
> Minimize the early e820 messages by printing less characters
> for the address range as well as abbreviating the type info
> for each entry.
> + pr_info("%s: %Lx+%Lx (%s)\n", who,
> + (unsigned long long) e820.map[i].addr,
> + (unsigned long long) e820.map[i].size,
> + e820_types(e820.map[i].type));
If we're going to change the way we print E820 ranges, I think
we should make them consistent with the way we handle %pR, e.g.,
use something like this:
"%s: [mem %#018Lx-%#018Lx]"
This is a little different because %pR wouldn't make the field
so wide, but when we discussed this earlier, keeping the table
alignment was thought to be important. That discussion starts
here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/9/22/248
Same comment applies to the update, remove, PCI gap (which
your patch currently doesn't touch), and EFI output.
I know this kind of derails the whole "remove characters" point
of your patch (and I support that in principle), but I do think
consistency is important, too. We have too many different ways
of printing the same information.
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
