On Fri, 18 Feb 2011, Mike Travis wrote:
> Minimize X2APIC messages by printing 8 per line and dropping
> the "enabled" flag since that's assumed. It will still print
> "disabled" if necessary.
>
> v2: updated to apply to x86-tip
>
For each patch in this series, it would be tremendously helpful to show
what format the current output is in and what the format is after the
patch is applied.
> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Jack Steiner <steiner@xxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Robin Holt <holt@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c | 3 +++
> drivers/acpi/tables.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> --- linux.orig/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> +++ linux/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> @@ -903,6 +903,9 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_madt_lapic_
> if (!count) {
> x2count = acpi_table_parse_madt(ACPI_MADT_TYPE_LOCAL_X2APIC,
> acpi_parse_x2apic, MAX_LOCAL_APIC);
> + /* insure trailing newline is output */
s/insure/ensure/
> + pr_cont("\n");
I know that this is the only code that passes ACPI_MADT_TYPE_LOCAL_X2APIC.
That said, this line really has no place in the caller.
> +
> count = acpi_table_parse_madt(ACPI_MADT_TYPE_LOCAL_APIC,
> acpi_parse_lapic, MAX_LOCAL_APIC);
> }
> --- linux.orig/drivers/acpi/tables.c
> +++ linux/drivers/acpi/tables.c
> @@ -66,11 +66,17 @@ void acpi_table_print_madt_entry(struct
> {
> struct acpi_madt_local_x2apic *p =
> (struct acpi_madt_local_x2apic *)header;
> - printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX
> - "X2APIC (apic_id[0x%02x] uid[0x%02x] %s)\n",
> - p->local_apic_id, p->uid,
> - (p->lapic_flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED) ?
> - "enabled" : "disabled");
> +
> + if ((p->uid & 7) == 0)
> + pr_info(PREFIX "X2APIC apic_id=uid:");
> +
> + pr_cont(" %02x=%02x%s%s",
> + p->local_apic_id, p->uid,
> + /* assume "enabled" unless "disabled" */
> + (p->lapic_flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED) ?
> + "" : " disabled",
Because you're printing only " disabled" when ACPI_MADT_ENABLED is not
set, this seems like the format of the line would be ambiguous with regard
to which entry it applies to. I could imagine a line such as
X2APIC apic_id=uid: 01=01 disabled 02=02
and then we're left wondering which entry is actually disabled. I'd
prefer "01=01(disabled) 02=02" instead.
Also, why did you drop the "0x" prefixes from the current format?
> + /* nl every 8th item */
> + (p->uid & 7) == 7 ? "\n" : "");
> }
> break;
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
