On Thu, 3 Feb 2011 20:14:17 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> > > The wakeup.run_wake_count ACPI device field is only used by the PCI > runtime PM code to "protect" devices from being prepared for > generating wakeup signals more than once in a row. However, it > really doesn't provide any protection, because (1) all of the > functions it is supposed to protect use their own reference counters > effectively ensuring that the device will be set up for generating > wakeup signals just once and (2) the PCI runtime PM code uses > wakeup.run_wake_count in a racy way, since nothing prevents > acpi_dev_run_wake() from being called concurrently from two different > threads for the same device. > > Remove the wakeup.run_wake_count ACPI device field which is > unnecessary, confusing and used in a wrong way. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/acpi/button.c | 2 -- > drivers/acpi/scan.c | 1 - > drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 16 ++++------------ > include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 1 - > 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) Ack on the PCI bits. Acked-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
